acreadiness policy
acreadiness-policy
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
Introduction source: author · github · b6483db44fb602654bca6a097185fcaddb305f97 Reference
Author's original introduction
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
SkillPi interpretation
- Tasks
- acreadiness policy
- Audience
- Use the scenarios stated in the author's introduction.
- Inputs and outputs
- See the complete author document; outputs have not been runtime verified by SkillPi.
- Software, accounts and paid services
- Check required software, accounts, costs and permissions in the full document; confirm and authorize actual file access and external services in your host. Domains referenced in the documents (not a runtime allowlist): No HTTP(S) domain stated. Changing readiness scores is not a security approval. Explain and confirm disabled checks or CI threshold changes; prefer changing weights. Pin and separately audit implementations fetched by npx. Pin external tools from official sources and audit them separately; SkillPi has not installed or run those dependencies. The user must authorize file changes, external transfers, secrets and costs in the host tool.
- Limits and differences
- Functionality, version status and outcome statements in the introduction are author claims. Only pinned source and static attachment evidence were checked; runtime behavior, external services and compatibility are not guaranteed.
- Testing
- Not tested
Permissions and checks before use
Automatically summarized from this main document. Matches may be examples or defensive advice; they are not actual permission declarations. Attachments, external dependencies and runtime behavior are not covered.
-
Install or fetch external dependencies
Use official sources and pin versions. Check install scripts in an isolated environment. This document check does not cover code downloaded later.
Mentioned in main document · lines 76, 84
Security rating and access scope
caution · Static evidence review; not a runtime safety guarantee.
Check required software, accounts, costs and permissions in the full document; confirm and authorize actual file access and external services in your host. Domains referenced in the documents (not a runtime allowlist): No HTTP(S) domain stated. Changing readiness scores is not a security approval. Explain and confirm disabled checks or CI threshold changes; prefer changing weights. Pin and separately audit implementations fetched by npx. Pin external tools from official sources and audit them separately; SkillPi has not installed or run those dependencies. The user must authorize file changes, external transfers, secrets and costs in the host tool.
Before use, confirm and authorize actual file access, external services and network destinations in your host. This review grants no runtime permissions.
Original SKILL.md
---
name: acreadiness-policy
description: 'Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.'
argument-hint: "[show | new <name> | apply <path-or-pkg>] — e.g. /acreadiness-policy show, /acreadiness-policy new strict-frontend"
---
# /acreadiness-policy — AgentRC policies
Use this skill when the user asks about **policies**, **strict mode**, **custom scoring**, **disabling checks**, **org standards**, or **CI gating** of readiness.
A policy is a small JSON file with three optional sections — `criteria`, `extras`, `thresholds` — that customise how AgentRC scores readiness.
## Built-in examples
AgentRC ships with three example policies in `examples/policies/`:
| Policy | What it does |
|---|---|
| `strict.json` | 100% pass rate, raises impact on key criteria |
| `ai-only.json` | Disables all repo-health checks, focuses on AI tooling |
| `repo-health-only.json` | Disables AI checks, focuses on traditional quality |
Recommend these as starting points before writing a custom policy.
## Policy schema
```jsonc
{
"name": "my-policy",
"criteria": {
"disable": ["env-example", "observability", "dependabot"],
"override": {
"readme": { "impact": "high", "level": 2 },
"lint-config": { "title": "Linter required" }
}
},
"extras": {
"disable": ["pre-commit"]
},
"thresholds": {
"passRate": 0.9
}
}
```
### Impact weights
| Impact | Weight |
|---|---|
| critical | 5 |
| high | 4 |
| medium | 3 |
| low | 2 |
| info | 0 |
`Score = 1 − (deductions / max possible weight)`. Grades: **A** ≥ 0.9, **B** ≥ 0.8, **C** ≥ 0.7, **D** ≥ 0.6, **F** < 0.6.
## Sub-commands
### `show`
List policies currently in effect (from `agentrc.config.json` `policies` array, or none).
### `new <name>`
Scaffold `policies/<name>.json` with sensible defaults. Walk the user through:
1. **What to disable** — irrelevant pillars or extras for their stack (e.g. disable `observability` for a static site).
2. **What to raise** — override `impact` to `high` or `critical` for must-haves (e.g. `readme`, `codeowners`).
3. **Pass-rate threshold** — typical org baselines: `0.7` (lenient), `0.85` (standard), `1.0` (strict).
4. Reference the policy from `agentrc.config.json`:
```json
{ "policies": ["./policies/<name>.json"] }
```
### `apply <path-or-pkg>`
Run `agentrc readiness --json --policy <source>` and re-render the report by handing off to the `assess` skill / `ai-readiness-reporter` agent. Supports chaining:
```bash
npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --json --policy ./org-baseline.json,./team-frontend.json
```
## CI gating
Combine policies with `--fail-level` to enforce a minimum maturity level in CI:
```yaml
- run: npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --policy ./policies/strict.json --fail-level 3
```
## Advanced
JSON policies can disable, override, and set thresholds — but **cannot add new criteria**. For new detection logic, point users at AgentRC's TypeScript plugin system (`docs/dev/plugins.md`).
## Operating rules
- **Never silently disable a pillar.** If the user wants to disable `observability`, confirm and explain the trade-off.
- **Prefer overriding `impact` over disabling.** Disabling hides the gap entirely; overriding lets it still appear in the report.
- **Recommend extras stay enabled.** They cost nothing — they don't affect the score.
- **Suggest layering** — most orgs want a baseline policy + per-team overrides chained with `--policy a.json,b.json`.
Copyright and license notice
MIT License Copyright GitHub, Inc. Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
User discussion